I apologize upfront for moving from remembrance to speculation. But, the FBI have released images of a person of interest (bottom right in attached pic), and even if he is apprehended, there will be discussion as to motive. So, I’m going there. And ‘there’ may surprisingly go back to my book, “Maggie’s Hammer” (https://maggieshammer.com/).
Was the person of interest a disgruntled student (or the like) with a political or personal motive? Unlikely. I’ve just spent seven years on and off college campuses. It’s not easy getting onto campus building roofs. And you’d be noticed acting shifty and carrying an odd bag. Think Butler. Folks recognized something was wrong, even if law enforcement did nothing. Plus, we know of no manifesto. And, he didn’t commit suicide.
To cut a long story short, and from my own research and experience in writing “Maggie’s Hammer” (https://tinyurl.com/vcehcaav), I would say this has the hallmarks of a professional hit.
Do not be fooled by the apparent age of the person of interest. People become military and intelligence vets in their twenties. And a pro would have been chosen to fit in as much as possible, while having the proficiency to get to a roof, take a shot from 200 yards, and then dispose of the gun and escape, without being stopped.
Ok. But who? It’s not the Dems or Soros or Gates. They have neither the organizational bandwidth or stomach. It would be someone cold and ruthless. Russians, Iran, Venezuela, drug cartel? Maybe. But, to what end? They have too much to lose in the current geopolitical environment.
And then, I remember that Kirk had started talking about Epstein being a creature of Israeli and American Intelligence (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccRNaLGavf8). And I realize that this could be a subterranean secret that perps might feel too important to have exposed, and dangerous enough to justify killing someone close to Trump.
Indeed, trawling through all of the covert arms and money-laundering networks and connections that go back to the Eighties in London, as described in “Maggie’s Hammer,” which then track forward to Epstein’s being recruited by Israeli Intelligence in London (in among the same groups of arms dealers and money-launderers that included the subject of my book, Hugh Simmonds CBE), it makes cruel sense that Kirk could have been a target for wanting to expose Epstein in this light (https://tinyurl.com/4uy5n8sh).
But, you might say (one more time) surely Epstein is not that important? Hmm. Lord Peter Mandelson just got fired as the UK Ambassador to Washington (bottom left in attached pic). It wasn’t because he was in the Birthday Book. It was because there were a series of close emails, in which Mandelson was advising Epstein to challenge his first conviction.
Mandelson must have met Epstein in London. They were not close due to sex. Mandelson is gay. However, in the Nineties, Mandelson was Tony Blair’s right-hand man, and bagman for illicit commissions and kickbacks going to the British Labour Party from arms deals. Epstein first made his money in London in the Eighties from arms deals and money-laundering. Epstein and Mandelson would have both known where all the skeletons were buried, and would have had a vested interest in protecting each other. Hence, Mandelson advising Epstein to push back on criminal interest in him.
Starmer clearly did a bad job vetting Mandelson. Was it just the closeness of the relationship between Epstein and Mandelson that caused the sacking, or the realization that too much scrutiny by Parliament and the British media might uncover the arms-dealing and money-laundering?
Is there an outside possibility Mandelson was fired and Kirk killed because of Epstein, arms-dealing, and money-laundering? And if you don’t understand the possible connections to the Eighties, do you need to buy “Maggie’s Hammer”? At this juncture, I can only answer the second question with certainty — yes. We will have to wait and see about anything else.
Facebook version and comments here.
Maggie's Hammer 
Leave a comment