**EPSTEIN, KIRK, MOSSAD, MAGGIE’S HAMMER — FROM THE SUBLIME TO THE RIDICULOUS, OR … ??**

Two media items that found their way to me.

First, one of many theories floating around that Israeli bodyguards for Charlie Kirk assassinated him — https://tinyurl.com/yj36j2bb.

I have written before that, way off in the land of intense spit-balling, I am open to the suggestion that Mossad, through cut-outs and false flags (for which they are famous, er, read “Maggie’s Hammer” — maggieshammer.org), might have been behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk — https://tinyurl.com/2ks64tk2 and https://tinyurl.com/yvw5rzzs.

But. No. I spent 30-some years exploring mysterious deaths. Assassinations are either about lone gunmen or deniable zones. They are not intricate, up-close-and-personal, human-intense operations. Too many moving parts. Too many loose ends. So. Nice try. But no.

Next up, a very well-resourced article, alleging that Epstein helped to secure a security agreement between Israel and Mongolia, via Israeli Prime Minister, Ehud Barak — https://tinyurl.com/3hh3dj2s.

First thing. Do not reject media outlets you do not recognize. Check out their bias. Use common sense to explore validity. This story is clearly well-investigated. and has about it a frightening ring of truth — well, for me.

Why the latter? The ‘former’ senior Israeli Intelligence officer, who was the source for much of “Maggie’s Hammer,” discussed with me that, after the Eighties, Israel was trying hard to make friends wherever it could. My source told me he had personally been involved in attempting to forge links with Azerbaijan, and then with one of the primary post-Gaddafi Libyan militia groups.

Yet, for me, the suggestion that Epstein might have been involved in arranging security agreements kind of blew my socks off. I appreciate that there are some of us (some longer than others) who have been trying to paint the picture of Epstein as more than merely a sexual blackmailer, and as an important and effective Mossad asset, going all the way back to the Eighties, and the matters described in “Maggie’s Hammer.” This article appears to confirm this, from an angle I have seen nowhere else.

So. Maybe, some ridiculous? But maybe also, a little bit of sublime?

Facebook version and comments here.